RelTest creates a robust connection between risk analysis, technical assessment and concrete assurance. Critical weaknesses are not only documented, but actively addressed.
We focus the analysis on the technical decision ahead, from structured weakness identification to an approved assurance strategy.
What we work on
Functions, failure effects, causes and dependencies are examined from the appropriate perspective. We also review existing analyses for technical depth and usability.
What you receive
A structured failure and cause analysis that makes critical relationships understandable.
What we work on
Risks are assessed based on impact, probability, detectability and available evidence. Uncertain assumptions are made explicit.
What you receive
A technically justified prioritisation that directs resources towards the decisive risks.
What we work on
We derive development measures, analyses and tests from prioritised risks and align them with maturity, cost and schedule.
What you receive
An actionable assurance plan with responsibilities, evidence and a clear sequence.
What we work on
Method selection, assessment criteria and documentation are reviewed for technical traceability and suitability in the specific product and project context.
What you receive
A documented technical rationale that provides robust support for reviews and later questions.
Risk management creates value when analysis, decision and implementation are closely connected.
Functions and interfaces change, requiring critical failure paths to be understood and prioritised early.
Extensive FMEAs or risk lists exist, but there is no robust link to tests and development measures.
Following a test or field failure, the cause, consequential risks and required assurance must be assessed transparently.
Further guidance on weak points, assurance and technical risk management.
We assess the starting point, decision need and existing analyses, then propose an appropriate scope.
